On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Rob Bonfiglio<[email protected]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure the UAC isn't going away.
Reports are that UAC is still there, but Microsoft has fixed the problems where it prompts you repeatedly for the same action (like copying a file... hello, Microsoft, did you use Vista at all before you released it?). There may also be some things it doesn't prompt on but just does, by default. > And I don't think you can blame the application compatibility > completely on Microsoft. Well, yes and no. Certainly, whatever Vista has is because of Microsoft's designs. So if Vista breaks compatibility with something, that's because of something Microsoft did. Now many the app vendor is doing something stupid. Who's to blame? I'd say the app vendor. But what if the app vendor was doing something stupid that Microsoft used to recommend, but has changed their stance on now? Who is to blame then? > Why is that not the vendors' fault for getting them out within a reasonable > time frame? It's interesting. Whenever somebody tries Linux, and it lacks a driver for something, that's a problem with Linux. But when Vista doesn't have a driver for something, that's the hardware manufacture's fault. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
