Good to know. Thanks. >>> Jon Harris <[email protected]> 6/18/2009 7:16 AM >>> Support and documentation is not any better either.
Jon On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Carol Fee <[email protected]> wrote: > NOD32 is not at all easy to manage. > > > CFee > > -----Original Message----- > From: RAY ZORZ [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 5:38 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: AV revisited > > We opted to dump McAfee for Nod32. Would've saved us a bunch of money. > We gotten overridden in the 11th hour by our CIO. Apparently he never > heard of the product. I'm guessing had we looked at Vipre the same > thing would've happened. > > But we'll keep Vipre in mind for next fiscal year. > > >>> Kurt Buff <[email protected]> 6/17/2009 1:11 PM >>> > Tough crowd. I wonder what it would have taken to get the business? > > Oh, well - at least you gave it your best shot. > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:52, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Not only that, SB sales gave them the full dog-and-pony show. They > were impressed with the product but not impressed enough. Our agents > really push their desktop systems to the max. Perhaps if eveybody here > screamed toward the bEast Coast when their systems slowed down even > more, they would relent. :( > > > > Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote on 06/17/2009 02:21:02 PM: > > > > > Give them the data on VIPRE, especially the pricing. They might > convert. > > > > > > Kurt > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:17, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > DANG! Within the year, I'm having VIPRE ripped violently from > my > > > dying grasp because NYC HQ has 4 times as many Ca-Ca users (and a > > > couple of NYC Big Guys insist on uniformity) > > > > -- > > > > Richard D. McClary > > > > Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group > > > > > > > > ASPCA(r) > > > > 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 > > > > Urbana, IL 61802 > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > P: 217-337-9761 > > > > C: 217-417-1182 > > > > F: 217-337-9761 > > > > www.aspca.org > > > > > > > > > > > > The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments > > > hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty > > > to Animals(r) (ASPCA(r)) and is intended only for use by the > > > addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged > and/or > > > confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of > > > this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > > distribution, copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and > any > > > attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received > > > this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by reply email > > > and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail > and > > > any printout thereof. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Evan Brastow" <[email protected]> wrote on > 06/17/2009 > > > 02:11:03 PM: > > > > > > > > > I used to say years ago that if CA antivirus was any good it > would > > > > > immediately remove itself from any workstation it was installed > on. > > > > > > > > > > It never did, though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 2:55 PM > > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > > > > Subject: Re: AV revisited > > > > > > > > > > +2 or is that +3 now. Whatever, just got my license keys for > Vipre > > > > > and Sunbelt's sales team will likely (said in a 'Godfather' > like > > > > > voice) make you an offer you can't refuse. > > > > > > > > > > Deep scans from McAfee weren't allowed on my servers because > it > > > > > would absolutely bring the server to a screeching halt, which > isnot good. > > > > > > > > > > Just made my desktop guys so happy today that they were about > to > > > > > give me hugs when I showed them in writing that Vipre > Enterprise > > > > > will remove McAfee automatically. Most of the IT people that > I > > > > > work with have switched to Vipre even though we have a free > home use > > > > > of McAfee.... > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:33 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:32 AM > > > > > > > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > > > > Subject: Re: AV revisited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How 'bout our sponsor's product (VIPRE)? > > > > > > > > > > Sales is trying to undercut -er- make competitive pricing for > > > > > switching from other products. Centralized control is > great... > > > > > > > > > > Despite claims of low load, running a deep scan will pretty > much > > > > > make a system unusable for the duration (but competitors will > > > > > probably do the same). > > > > > -- > > > > > Richard D. McClary > > > > > Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group > > > > > > > > > > ASPCA(r) > > > > > 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36 > > > > > Urbana, IL 61802 > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > P: 217-337-9761 > > > > > C: 217-417-1182 > > > > > F: 217-337-9761 > > > > > www.aspca.org > > > > > > > > > > The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments > > > > > hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of > > > Cruelty to Animals(r) > > > > > (ASPCA(r)) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) > named > > > > > herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential > > > > > information. If you are not the intended recipient of this > e-mail, > > > > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, > > > > > copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any > attachments > > > > > hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > e-mail in > > > > > error, please immediately notify me by reply email and > permanently > > > > > delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any > printout thereof. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Erik Goldoff" <[email protected]> wrote on 06/17/2009 > 01:26:33 PM: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > got a friend with a small law firm as a client, HQ office > about 20 > > > > > > stations and 6 servers, 10 satellite offices with 5 stations > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They have Trend and are VERY unhappy with the latest updates, > and > > > > > > will not consider Symantec nor McAfee as a replacement ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Given that, what would you recommend as a best > price/performance > > > > > > product with some centralized control ? AVG, AVAST, Sophos, > or what > > > > > > ??? And why ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Erik Goldoff > > > > > > IT Consultant > > > > > > Systems, Networks, & Security > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sherry Abercrombie > > > > > > > > > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from > magic." > > > > > Arthur C. Clarke > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > > > > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
