Suggesstion, if you want the Malware/Spyware with the Mcafee Product,
then squeeze the vendor and hard, or change to a vendor that will give
you the deal you want. 

 

On my side, looks like we going HIPS on the servers and we already got
it on the workstations, therefore the malware/spyware is going to be a
non-issue pretty soon, since we will be controlling all the execution
via the HIPS. 

 

More fun fun, but will be worth it in the end... 

 

Z

 

Edward Ziots

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

MCSE,MCSA,MCP+I, ME, CCA, Security +, Network +

[email protected]

Phone:401-639-3505

________________________________

From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 2:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antivirus/Anti-spyware/Anti-adware/etc

 

Yeah - that too ! 

 

It's actually more like a 40K 'pay-to-play-fee'  LOL

 

Warm regards,


Stu Sjouwerman
Founder, VP Marketing.
P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
F: +1-727-562-5199
[email protected]


  

 

 

________________________________

From: Don Ely [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 2:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Antivirus/Anti-spyware/Anti-adware/etc

Just an FYI, but Vipre didn't make Gartner's list because Stu didn't pay
them a $20 per year subscription to be listed...  ;o)

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Raper, Jonathan <[email protected]>
wrote:

I think a significant part of the equation is how large of a network
you're supporting and how much administration is involved. We've been
running McAfee and ePO since 2002/2003, and from a security standpoint
it has been outstanding when it comes to Antivirus protection.
Unfortunately it does little in the realm of helping to protect us from
Malware/Spyware. There's ANOTHER McAfee product for that ($$$). From an
administration standpoint, it has been a significant headache - so much
so that we've been contemplating replacing it when our licensing support
agreement is up for renewal in March of 2010. Another significant part
of the equation is how educated we are as an end user/customer. I'm
wondering if better education on the McAfee product for our
administration staff would solve some of our headaches. Then again, it
is AV. We need it to work, and we need proof that it is updating. How
much administration should it require?

 

We're supporting hundreds of desktops and servers, by year end we'll be
over 500 workstations and servers total. What I don't need is even more
of an administration headache. I've heard really good things about NOD
from an administration standpoint, and just about everybody seems to be
complaining about how much stuff Symantec breaks. We've had very little
issue with McAfee breaking things, but administration is frustrating,
according to my admin(s).

 

We're contemplating ESET NOD32, Symantec/Norton, Trend Micro, Sophos,
and VIPRE. I've seen good and bad things about all of them, and VIPRE is
so young of a product comparatively, I'm skittish, but given the good
things I've heard about VIPRE, combined with the relative cost, I can't
ignore them. I've seen enough bad about the rest of them, that I'm
contemplating staying where we are and dealing with "the devil we know",
but I've had enough bad experience with McAfee, I really want to know if
there really is anything truly better out there that I can trust. From
the people I've talked with, anyone who started with McAfee ePO and
moved to Symantec HATES Symantec, and anyone who started with Symantec
and moved to McAfee HATES McAfee...

 

If you look at Gartner's last Magic Quadrant : 
http://www.eset.com/gartner/ McAfee, Symantec, Sophos and Trend are the
"leaders" in the industry...VIPRE didn't even make the list...

 

Anybody else in the same/similar dilemma or better yet, anybody else
successfully find a way out that they are pleased with?

Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA
[email protected]
www.eaglemds.com 

________________________________

From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 3:03 PM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: Antivirus/Anti-spyware/Anti-adware/etc 

 

What do you guys like (besides Vipre, obviously! :-)) for
antivirus/anti-spyware/anti-malware/etc? Our AVG is coming up for
renewal in January and I'm not sure I want to renew it. I am considering
Vipre, although I thought the interface (on the home version - didn't
have a spare server to set up the Enterprise trial) was a bit "clunky"
due to having to "white list" an app in several different places. :-(

 

I'm also considering purchasing a bunch of licenses for Malware Bytes so
I can have that on every desktop. I'm also thinking about
F-Secure/F-Prot. I know that one of our vendors uses and recommends
Kaspersky and I have used them in the past at home.  Any others? 

 

The idea of using a Microsoft antivirus doesn't sit well with me.... Of
course there's always the argument of "they know where the security
holes are so they can protect them." But my answer to that is, "well, if
they know where the holes are, they can fix 'em and not charge me for an
antivirus product!" :-)

 

  

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an
intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute
or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any
action in reliance on the information that it contains.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to