That was my thought too, but like you, I'm no expert, so I thought I'd ask here. J
John-AldrichTile-Tools From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN question Not an expert here, but wouldn't that negate the point of an HA solution. How well one vendor does it vs another maybe an issue, but if its HA there should be zero data loss; otherwise its not HA. From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:10 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SAN question I was talking to another prospective SAN vendor this afternoon and they said that you wouldn't want to have two single-controller machines in a high-availability configuration because you risk having data corruption because of lack of cache coherency. Is this just marketing speak or is this a real potential problem? John-AldrichTile-Tools ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
