Thanks, guys. I suspected as much, but didn't have the knowledge to call "bullsh!t!" on the "technical specialist" for the prospective vendor. One reason I'm refusing to consider one prospective vendor is their claims to "creating" iSCSI and bad-mouthing their competition. I don't want someone who's only way of pumping up THEIR hardware is to badmouth the competition. If your equipment isn't good enough to stand on it's own, without you badmouthing the competition, I don't want it. Sure you can play up the differences to your advantage, but there are ways to do it without badmouthing the competition. J
John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 6:00 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN question +50 From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SAN question +5 -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Phil Brutsche <[email protected]> wrote: I call BS. Someone is throwing technobabble at you to scare you. John Aldrich wrote: > I was talking to another prospective SAN vendor this afternoon and they > said that you wouldn't want to have two single-controller machines in a > high-availability configuration because you risk having data corruption > because of lack of cache coherency. > > Is this just marketing speak or is this a real potential problem? -- Phil Brutsche [email protected] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
