I think the nomenclature makes things a little confusing.  We had that
problem around here, too, for quite a while after setting up a SAN (many
folks still have a problem).  I *think* you are using the term SAN to
refer to a disk array.  A SAN is like a LAN, MAN, or WAN.  It is the
network, not some particular thing that is attached to the network.  If
you have 2 disk arrays that are connected, you do not have "2 SANs", you
have 1 SAN and 2 disk arrays.  The SAN itself is comprised of the fibre
channel switches and the things that connect to them (just like a LAN
consists of switches/routers and the things that connect to them).  This
concept is important, as it makes it clearer why you would attach a tape
drive through the SAN.  By talking to your tape drive through the SAN,
you remove the need for the tape drive to be in close physical proximity
to your backup server.  If you are able to have geographically separated
data centers connected to the same SAN, this means that you can have
your tape backup automatically "off site".  The server doesn't know or
care where the tape drive is, it just talks to it over the SAN.
 
We are doing something like this.  We have 2 data centers, and we have a
disk array and a tape library in each.  The data is on the disk array is
replicated in real time to the secondary data center.  Our backup system
makes a copy of the backup to the secondary data center.  We are able to
do this because we have plenty of fiber between these 2 locations, and
both our LAN/MAN and our SAN make use of this fiber.
 
Bill Mayo

________________________________

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 10:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SAN question



If you are just backing up to tape and your SAN goes down, where will
you restore too? Do you have a spare disk pool to use?

If it was "me", I would be looking at a SAN solution that offers its own
proven DR solution.

Since I only know NetApp, they have a tool called SnapMirror that is
built into the OS. You pay for the license and plug in the serial.

Then setup your DR targets and let it rip. If your primary SAN goes
down, you can do some clicks and bring the system online with all your
data ready to access.

 

But you seem to be talking about a lot of things you want. You want DR,
you want clustering. If you cluster, maybe you only need to backup to
tape. Unless you want to buy a clustered SAN and a DR SAN. Of course if
you are going to have a DR SAN, I assume you have a DR location?

I mean if the building burns to the ground do you have a location with
the resources needed to keep the company running? Not just hold the
data?

 

Have you narrowed this down to 3 vendors yet?

 

From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 6:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SAN question

 

Guys, I'm still working on my storage needs, as the project I've been
working on probably won't get approved until early next year at the
earliest. I was talking to a D/R consultant recommended by one of the
folks on this list. Unfortunately, he does not work with SMB clients,
only large clients such as Coca Cola, etc. 

 

I had been thinking of getting two SANs and having one replicate to the
other for D/R purposes. Most of our operations run off the AS/400 so
that would not be much affected (except if we are able to some how back
up to the SAN, which is unlikely with our current AS/400, due to disk
space limitations on the 400) one way or the other by the SAN project.
The aforementioned consultant suggested that we look into getting just
one SAN and a tape backup for it or online backup service instead of
doing two SANs. Most of the data on the Windows side of things would be
hard to replace if it died, so while it's not "critical" to our
operations, it's still highly important.

 

What do you guys think of that suggestion? Would any of you guys do
something like that? Why or why not? 

Also, anyone know any D/R consultants in the North Georgia area who work
with SMB clients?

 

  

 

 

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to