If you are just backing up to tape and your SAN goes down, where will you
restore too? Do you have a spare disk pool to use?

If it was "me", I would be looking at a SAN solution that offers its own
proven DR solution.

Since I only know NetApp, they have a tool called SnapMirror that is built
into the OS. You pay for the license and plug in the serial.

Then setup your DR targets and let it rip. If your primary SAN goes down,
you can do some clicks and bring the system online with all your data ready
to access.

 

But you seem to be talking about a lot of things you want. You want DR, you
want clustering. If you cluster, maybe you only need to backup to tape.
Unless you want to buy a clustered SAN and a DR SAN. Of course if you are
going to have a DR SAN, I assume you have a DR location?

I mean if the building burns to the ground do you have a location with the
resources needed to keep the company running? Not just hold the data?

 

Have you narrowed this down to 3 vendors yet?

 

From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 6:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SAN question

 

Guys, I'm still working on my storage needs, as the project I've been
working on probably won't get approved until early next year at the
earliest. I was talking to a D/R consultant recommended by one of the folks
on this list. Unfortunately, he does not work with SMB clients, only large
clients such as Coca Cola, etc. 

 

I had been thinking of getting two SANs and having one replicate to the
other for D/R purposes. Most of our operations run off the AS/400 so that
would not be much affected (except if we are able to some how back up to the
SAN, which is unlikely with our current AS/400, due to disk space
limitations on the 400) one way or the other by the SAN project. The
aforementioned consultant suggested that we look into getting just one SAN
and a tape backup for it or online backup service instead of doing two SANs.
Most of the data on the Windows side of things would be hard to replace if
it died, so while it's not "critical" to our operations, it's still highly
important.

 

What do you guys think of that suggestion? Would any of you guys do
something like that? Why or why not? 

Also, anyone know any D/R consultants in the North Georgia area who work
with SMB clients?

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to