Indeed. I have no sympathy for the McMansion folks. Mind you, I wouldn't mind having one myself, but I recognize the costs involved. Heck, if the only way to get good cell reception on my 20-acre spread was to lease a tower to on a 1/2 acre plot, I'd do it, but I'd drive a hard bargain and make sure I got good Internet access out of it too.
Kurt On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 13:23, hg <[email protected]> wrote: > I border on a rural area that now mostly contains huge homes on huge lots > built by people who don’t want neighbors (urban sprawl). These folks can > rationalize buying giant lots, building long driveways, drilling wells, > buying snowplows and putting 2x the normal mileage on their vehicles. But if > a carrier says “we need $3,000 to extend our plant to your house” the > carrier is evil and the government needs to do something (such as getting > everyone else to pay for their lifestyle choice). > > > > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 4:15 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: National broadband > > > > The government always looks (based on complaining of constituents) to step > in when an industry doesn't properly regulate itself - for better or for > worse, its happens. Its what government does. > > I do not believe by any stretch that anyone advocating for socialism. Thats > a very extreme outlook as to why our government does what it invariably does > to "protect" its people. > > -- > ME2 > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Bill Lambert <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Another huge spending project by our leadership…and government intervention > into our private lives. This, like the healthcare bill, is the start of > centralized control over our lives. If you think that this is just a method > to give poor folks access, think again.. This to me is the start of the > American version of socialism. > > I detest what our current leadership is doing to this country. But, hey, > it’s just me…sorry if I offended or took it too far off topic but I am angry > with it all…. > > Bill Lambert > > Concuity > > Phone 847-941-9206 > > The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached > files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the > recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or > authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby notified > that you have received this communication in error and that any review, > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact > the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Thank you. > > From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 1:39 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: National broadband > > Thoughts, comments? > > http://www.broadband.gov/ > > David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER > NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION > (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 > > > > > > > > > > ---- Content & Policy Scan by M+ Guardian ---- > > Millions of safe & clean messages delivered daily > > > > > > > > ---AV & Spam Filtering by M+Guardian - Risk Free Email (TM)--- ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
