Indeed - was.

Today's dislike is nothing like it was, when they were a monopoly, and
you couldn't hook up your own phone - had to have one of theirs,
because otherwise chaos would ensue, and the end of the world would
then be imminent, with cats and dogs living together, etc.

2010/3/17 Richard Stovall <[email protected]>:
> Was?
>
> (Sent from my iPhone...)
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:05 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Oh how people forget how hated ATT was back in the day.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 17:55, Harry Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Putting the myriad of issues related to government control, net
>>> neutrality, increase and dissemination of crapware, botnets, etc I
>>> actually
>>> look forward to the increase of speeds across the nation. I live in
>>> NYC, one
>>> of the outer boroughs specifically, and it's purely and absurdly
>>> ridiculous
>>> that I have to succumb to Time warner's Joke of "High-Speed": 10
>>> Mbps Down
>>> and 512K up. It's laughable that I truly have no other choice and
>>> if nothing
>>> else, the plan will provide and mandate Big telco, small telco, to
>>> deliver
>>> much higher speeds across the board. Even as we speak there are
>>> services
>>> such as Boxee, Vonage, iTunes, bitTorrent, Xbox Live that just keep
>>> becoming
>>> more and more prevelant and chewing up bandwidth. And i don't need
>>> to tell
>>> you folks how in the world is a 512K line suppose to cope?  It's
>>> only a
>>> matter of time where Internet truly becomes a utility and it isn't
>>> a stretch
>>> that the following makes sense:
>>> Chief among its goals, the F.C.C. wants future broadband investment
>>> to be
>>> targeted to the areas where gaps in service remain. It will direct
>>> this
>>> investment in part through the Universal Service Fund, an $8
>>> billion-a-year
>>> program for telephone and Internet access paid through a phone-bill
>>> surcharge. Over time, the subsidies for Internet will increase and
>>> those for
>>> phone will dissipate, with the knowledge that people can make calls
>>> over the
>>> Internet.
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The question was limited, so I answered as asked.
>>>>
>>>> Point noted and respectfully disagreed with, except to note that the
>>>> Constitution is well conceived but poorly written, though it was the
>>>> best that could be done at the time - perhaps that's where our
>>>> agreement might lay.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 16:42, Jonathan Link <[email protected]
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Your set is too limited.
>>>>> All administrations are about more government, where we can have a
>>>>> discussion is the degree to which the administration  in question
>>>>> expanded
>>>>> government.  Even going back to Washington.  No disrespect to the
>>>>> founding
>>>>> fathers intended, it's the nature of the beast.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both Bush and Obama are all about more government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Didn't like either one, and still don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:06, Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> And were you equally unhappy during the last administration?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:47 PM
>>>>>>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: National broadband
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another huge spending project by our leadership…and government
>>>>>>> intervention
>>>>>>> into our private lives.  This, like the healthcare bill, is the
>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> centralized control over our lives.   If you think that this is
>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> method to give poor folks access, think again.   This to me is
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> the American version of socialism.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I detest what our current leadership is doing to this country.
>>>>>>> But,
>>>>>>> hey,
>>>>>>> it’s just me…sorry if I offended or took it too far off to
>>>>>>> pic but I
>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>> angry
>>>>>>> with it all….
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bill Lambert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Concuity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phone  847-941-9206
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The information contained in this e-mail message, including any
>>>>>>> attached
>>>>>>> files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>> recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient
>>>>>>> (or
>>>>>>> authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are
>>>>>>> hereby
>>>>>>> notified
>>>>>>> that you have received this communication in error and that any
>>>>>>> review,
>>>>>>> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
>>>>>>> strictly
>>>>>>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>> contact
>>>>>>> the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 1:39 PM
>>>>>>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>>>>>>> Subject: National broadband
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts, comments?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.broadband.gov/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
>>>>>>> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
>>>>>>> (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>>>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to