On Thu May 13 2010, you wrote: > No, I was just joking about the Hotmail bit. ;-) > > On 5/13/2010 5:49 PM, Jon Harris wrote: > > Do you really think that sending this kind of information thru a > > Hotmail/Yahoo/gmail is any better? Maybe to send a link to one of the > > secure data transmission methods it would be an idea and maybe a good > > idea. No owner information without a lot of digging to find the owner > > of the hotmail/yahoo/gmail account. > > I would second that if you do this then you have the receiver call > > into the office and get the password to the secure vaulted information > > or better yet make them come in and get it. > > Jon > > I really think that the combination of an "anonymous" Hotmail or Gmail or yahoo account *along with* the vault is a good solution. That way there's nothing obvious to tie it back to the original medical facility, in case there's someone "shoulder surfing" etc.
-- Thanks, John Aldrich Blueridge Industries IT Manager ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
