Linux filesystems – SDFS – and Zettabyte stand out as good examples of dedup 
filesystems. There's also no reason a linux server can't act as a SMB host.

----
Jack Kramer
Computer Systems Specialist
University Relations, Michigan State University
w: 517-884-1231 / c: 248-635-4955

From: "Raper, Jonathan - Eagle" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:11:01 -0500
To: NT System Admin Issues 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: document sprawl

That’s a great idea in theory, but aside from NetApp, are there any big time 
players who are doing primary storage de-duplication at the byte or block 
level? Generally when people talk about de-dupe, they are talking about 
secondary storage and backup mechanisms. Sure there has been talk about 
sub-file dedupe in primary storage for years, but who is really doing it yet?

Single Instance Store in Server 2003 and 2008 will help, but the files have to 
be identical in size and content (name and date/time stamp can be different). 
However, even then, it is (from my understanding) only really available in 
Storage Server 2003/2008 which I believe is only available bundled as an 
appliance from an OEM.

Real (IMHO, anyway) deduplication happens at the byte or block level, keeping 
only unique bits and pieces of differing files. If I have 100 copies of a power 
point and only change one name on the last page, then I get 1 copy of the power 
point, and only the blocks of data that comprise the name changes on the 
remaining 99 copies. SIS won’t do that; in that example, you’d still have 100 
copies of the file. De-dupe would do that, but like I said, aside from NetApp, 
who is really doing sub-file dedupe on primary storage right now?

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/datacenter/?p=2913&tag=content;leftCol

http://searchstorage.techtarget.co.uk/tip/0,289483,sid181_gci1518522,00.html



Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA
[email protected]<BLOCKED::mailto:%[email protected]>
www.eaglemds.com<BLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/>

________________________________
From: Kramer, Jack [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 12:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: document sprawl

Why would the extra copies disappear on a dedup solution? The file markers 
would exist in multiple places but the common blocks would only be written to 
disk once, leaving just the individual blocks as extra usage. For a file 
duplicated many times you'd use only (n-(n-1)+(small amount for descriptors)) 
of space to host the duplicates. That sounds like it would free quite a bit of 
disk for you while also allowing your users to continue in their set ways.

----
Jack Kramer
Computer Systems Specialist
University Relations, MichiganState University
w: 517-884-1231 / c: 248-635-4955

From: S Powell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:24:12 -0500
To: NT System Admin Issues 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: document sprawl

that is a good thought.  We've discussed that, but we don't have projects that 
end like that , tend to more have ongoing things.

i'd love to run a dedupe and and then pitch the extra copies, but then people 
wouldn't know where to find anything because they wouldn't remember where they 
put the originals.

welcome to the machine.


I 'm grateful for all the feedback on this topic and glad to know that I'm not 
the only one facing some of these challenges.
Google.com  Learn it. Live it. Love it.

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 21:54, Ken Schaefer 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
A couple of things I could think of...

Implement a product that does disk de-dupe?

For project related work, incorporate document clean up into the project 
shutdown phase - make the manager responsible for putting the final versions of 
documents into whatever your master repository is

Cheers
Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Saturday, 4 December 2010 6:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: document sprawl
They ignore the warnings.  Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.  They would 
rather blame their inability to get work done on lack of storage rather than 
the fact they didn't clean up all of their old "stuff" to begin with.  This is 
an old battle.  One I'm weary of fighting.


-----Original Message-----
From: VIPCS [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: document sprawl
We think you can automatically send them warnings when they are close to their 
quotas.

You also have leverage to negotiate with them at that point - an extra 10% 
increase in exchange for deleting old files, and you know what the quota was 
before, and can tell whether they are fulfilling their end of the agreement.
Sincerely,

Jeffrey and Mary Jane Harris
VIPCS


-----Original Message-----
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 5:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: document sprawl
Doesn't work.  They let them fill up and then gripe that they can't save their 
files because the file system is full.
-----Original Message-----
From: VIPCS [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: document sprawl
A bit simplistic, but have you considered disk quotas for server file storage?
Sincerely,

Jeffrey and Mary Jane Harris
VIPCS


-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Wimberly [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 12:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: document sprawl

I have attempted to tackle this issue before, I like to call it "encourage 
spring cleaning!" but my words always seem to fall on deaf ears.

Lately every time I bring it up we end up buying more hard drives for the 
server!  I give up.  Maybe I'm just too cheap?



On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Jeff Brown 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> In regards to email, we were able to establish a retention policy that
> messages in the Inbox, Sent Items, and Deleted Items folders are all
deleted
> after 90 days.  Exchange mailbox manager allowed to do that weekly.
> Don't manage other folders.  Not perfect, but it helped.
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Don Guyer 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>>
>> I'd be interested in a solution to this. Been fighting it for years
>> to no avail, other than running a "data inventory" program (such as
>> TreeSize)
and
>> doing a manual compare.
>>
>>
>>
>> Don't forget all of the email attachments saved along with the
>> original email.
>>
>>
>>
>> J
>>
>>
>>
>> Don Guyer
>>
>> Systems Engineer - Information Services
>>
>> Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
>>
>> 431 W. Lancaster Avenue
>>
>> Devon, PA 19333
>>
>> Direct: (610) 993-3299
>>
>> Fax: (610) 650-5306
>>
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: S Powell [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
>> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 11:17 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: document sprawl
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Everybody </Dr. Nick>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd like to pick your brains about how you deal with document sprawl,
>> I was reading in another thread about how users would use their
>> "Recycle Bin" as their archive. <shudder>
>>
>> we have users that will keep tens of copies of the same document in
>> various locations around their "My Documents"; as well as in tens of
>> locations within  our "shared" folders on the network ...
>>
>>
>>
>> User education only goes so far when it comes to "please don't do that"
as
>> they nod and then keep doing it.
>>
>>  I think we've moved beyond being nice and we've found ourselves
>>
>> mired in needing a sledgehammer.  I'd just like to wrap it in a bit
>> of velvet.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thoughts, Policies, procedures etc, would be helpful in this.
>>
>>
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>>
>> ./s
>> Google.com  Learn it. Live it. Love it.
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>> ---
>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> or send an email to 
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>> ---
>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> or send an email to 
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

________________________________
Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to