Agreed. But at the same time I would say most DI apps should already be
supporting multi-layered OpenEXR files by now.


-diogo

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Randy Little <[email protected]>wrote:

> Most DI apps do now support RGBA DPX files.  its a matter of what flavor
> of DPX that differers.   Even Lustre which is RGB uses backburner to stripe
> the alpha and nest it alla flame style alpha nesting.   So its pretty
> important that Nuke support this correctly.   I get asked for alphas and
> when grading ask for alphas all the time.
>
>
> Randy S. Little
> http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 15:55, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Most DI apps and film out will error on dpx files with an alpha.  Same
>> with the wrong endian order.
>>
>> ------
>> Deke Kincaid
>> Creative Specialist
>> The Foundry
>> Mobile: (310) 883 4313
>> Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516
>>
>> The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd.
>> Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027
>>
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2011, at 16:37, Michael Hatton <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> DPX specification does support alpha - see 'Image Data' here -
>> http://www.cineon.com/ff_draft.php
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:03 AM, John Vanderbeck <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> That was always my understanding.  That DPX (being originally based CIN
>>> for delivering film scans) did not support an alpha channel.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *rahul kv
>>> *Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2011 12:30 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Re: Alpha problem in DPX 2K 10-bit****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I might be wrong but is DPX format not intended for delivering Alpha? **
>>> **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From:* terence_fdes <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Sent:* Friday, 18 November 2011 10:56 AM
>>> *Subject:* [Nuke-users] Re: Alpha problem in DPX 2K 10-bit****
>>>
>>> *Srikanth wrote:* ****
>>>
>>> Check this earlier discussion :
>>>
>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=358&sid=d31e65d874f2e8ea95a0723b5e4fa8d5
>>>
>>> it might be useful for you!
>>>
>>> -sri
>>>
>>> Quoting vfxsrini :****
>>>
>>> *Quote:* ****
>>>
>>> Alpha problem in DPX 2K 10-bit
>>>
>>> We wish to deliver dpx files in 2K 10-bit [2048 x 1156] with an alpha
>>> channel
>>> where 3D elements/characters. Basically, it would offer them better
>>> control in the DI
>>>
>>> When we Write a DPX from Nuke with the alpha activated in the write
>>> node, the resulting image shows up on Avid DS-Nitris or Fusion is a
>>> black & white image with scanlines.In nuke it showing proper.
>>>
>>> Is this a bug, is this not supported or are we just missing something.
>>>
>>> In any case, what can we do to offer the best image quality to our
>>> client.
>>>
>>> Note: On earlier projects when we were outputting to HD [1920 x
>>> 1080] we never
>>> faced this problem with DPX files. We also tested tiff with alpha @ 16
>>> bit
>>> [2048 x 1157] & DPX 2K in 8-Bit - both had no problems.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The earlier discussion ended up without any solutions & it was posted
>>> way back in June 2008. Apparently this seems to be a bug in Nuke and we
>>> would really appreciate if a quick solution is found.
>>>
>>> NOTE: The problem arises when working with CGI elements alone and output
>>> in "DPX 10-Bit". If one choses to output in dpx 8-bit then there are no
>>> problems with alpha. However chosing 8-bit is a dead loss and not a
>>> practical solution when outputting at 2K resolutions - in this case 2048 x
>>> 1157 for a Animated Feature Film.
>>>
>>> Can the Foundry Software development Team look into this at the earliest
>>>
>>> Thanks****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Avid DS Nitris Colorist****
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users****
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to