It was the same here - shot directly in ProRes 444.
No idea what though

 
Howard



>________________________________
> From: Igor Majdandzic <[email protected]>
>To: 'Nuke user discussion' <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Friday, 29 March 2013, 16:29
>Subject: AW: AW: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts
> 
>
>Do you know what caused them?
> 
>-- 
>igor majdandzic
>compositor |
>[email protected]
>BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com
> 
>Von:[email protected] 
>[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Magno Borgo
>Gesendet: Freitag, 29. März 2013 14:06
>An: Nuke user discussion
>Betreff: Re: AW: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts
> 
>I've seen the exactly same artifacts when working on a film shot on Alexa. 
>These are nasty specially when keying... same issue, shot directly in Proress 
>4444.
> 
>Magno.
> 
> 
> 
>We've been having some problems with noise on some footages from Alexa, but 
>nothing remotely near to that.
>> 
>>diogo
>> 
>>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Jonathan Egstad <[email protected]> 
>>wrote:
>>No idea, but it looks an awful lot like filtering from a slight resize 
>>operation.
>> 
>>-jonathan
>>
>>On Mar 27, 2013, at 5:29 PM, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]> 
>>wrote:
>>do you mean in camera? because that was from the original qt footage
>>> 
>>>-- 
>>>igor majdandzic
>>>compositor |
>>>[email protected]
>>>BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com
>>> 
>>>Von:[email protected] 
>>>[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Jonathan 
>>>Egstad
>>>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2013 01:10
>>>An: Nuke user discussion
>>>Cc: Nuke user discussion
>>>Betreff: Re: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts
>>> 
>>>Looks like a very  slight resize was done.
>>>-jonathan
>>>
>>>On Mar 27, 2013, at 4:56 PM, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]> 
>>>wrote:
>>>Hey guys,
>>>>we got footage from a shoot with Alexa being the camera. It was shot in 
>>>>ProRess 444. The problem is: The picture has some artifacts which confuse 
>>>>me the codec being 444. I attached some images which show some of the grain 
>>>>patterns. Is this normal?
>>>> 
>>>>thx,
>>>>                Igor
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>-- 
>>>>igor majdandzic
>>>>compositor |
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com
>>>> 
>>>>Von:[email protected] 
>>>>[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Deke 
>>>>Kincaid
>>>>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. März 2013 23:47
>>>>An: Nuke user discussion
>>>>Betreff: Re: [Nuke-users] FusionI/O and Nuke
>>>> 
>>>>Hi Michael
>>>>I'm actually testing this right now as Fusionio just gave us a bunch of 
>>>>them.  Early tests reveal that with dpx it's awesome but with openexr zip 
>>>>compressed file it it is spending more time with compression, not sure if 
>>>>it is cpu bound or what(needs more study but its slower).  Openexr 
>>>>uncompressed files though are considerably superfast but of course the 
>>>>issue is that it is 18 meg a frame.  These are single layer rgba exr files.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----
>>>>Deke Kincaid
>>>>Creative Specialist
>>>>The Foundry
>>>>Mobile: (310) 883 4313
>>>>Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516
>>>>
>>>>The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd.
>>>>Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027
>>>> 
>>>>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]> 
>>>>wrote:
>>>>I'm evaluating one of these at the moment and am interested to know if 
>>>>others have got it working with Nuke nicely, meaning, have you been able to 
>>>>really utilise the insane bandwidth of this card to massively accelerate 
>>>>any part of your day to day compositing?
>>>> 
>>>>So far, I've found it has no benefit when localising all Reads in a 
>>>>somewhat heavy comp, or even playing back a sequence of exr's or deep 
>>>>files, compared to localised sequences on a 10K Raptor drive also in my 
>>>>workstation - hopefully I'm missing something big though, this is day one 
>>>>after all.  
>>>> 
>>>>There may be real tangible benefits to putting the Nuke cache on it though 
>>>>- I'll see how it goes.
>>>> 
>>>>I'm also guessing that as gpu processing becomes more prevalent in Nuke 
>>>>that we will see a real speed advantage handing data from a card like this 
>>>>straight to the gpu.
>>>> 
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Michael
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>> 
>>><crop-plate.jpg>
>>><crop-plate_areas.jpg>
>>><crop-plate_areas-edgeDetect.jpg>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>_______________________________________________
>>>Nuke-users mailing list
>>>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Nuke-users mailing list
>>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> 
>
>
>
>-- 
>Magno Borgo
>www.boundaryvfx.com
>www.borgo.tv
>Brasil:Curitiba:GMT= -3
>_______________________________________________
>Nuke-users mailing list
>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to