Are the rolls that have it later in the day and earlier clips ok ? Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Mar 2013, at 07:31, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]> wrote: > I had to resize the crop to make it obvious, but the filtering from that > operation did slightly add to the appearance of that artifact. Some rolls do > have it, most obvious in even backgrounds and some dont. First I thought they > filmed with LT or such, but the metadata proved me wrong. > So maybe, I contact the Arri guys. > > Thanks guys. > > -- > igor majdandzic > compositor | > [email protected] > BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com > > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Jonathan > Egstad > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2013 01:51 > An: Nuke user discussion > Cc: Nuke user discussion > Betreff: Re: AW: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts > > No idea, but it looks an awful lot like filtering from a slight resize > operation. > > -jonathan > > On Mar 27, 2013, at 5:29 PM, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > do you mean in camera? because that was from the original qt footage > > -- > igor majdandzic > compositor | > [email protected] > BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com > > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Jonathan > Egstad > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2013 01:10 > An: Nuke user discussion > Cc: Nuke user discussion > Betreff: Re: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts > > Looks like a very slight resize was done. > > -jonathan > > On Mar 27, 2013, at 4:56 PM, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hey guys, > we got footage from a shoot with Alexa being the camera. It was shot in > ProRess 444. The problem is: The picture has some artifacts which confuse me > the codec being 444. I attached some images which show some of the grain > patterns. Is this normal? > > thx, > Igor > > > > -- > igor majdandzic > compositor | > [email protected] > BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com > > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Deke > Kincaid > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. März 2013 23:47 > An: Nuke user discussion > Betreff: Re: [Nuke-users] FusionI/O and Nuke > > Hi Michael > > I'm actually testing this right now as Fusionio just gave us a bunch of them. > Early tests reveal that with dpx it's awesome but with openexr zip > compressed file it it is spending more time with compression, not sure if it > is cpu bound or what(needs more study but its slower). Openexr uncompressed > files though are considerably superfast but of course the issue is that it is > 18 meg a frame. These are single layer rgba exr files. > > ----- > Deke Kincaid > Creative Specialist > The Foundry > Mobile: (310) 883 4313 > Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516 > > The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd. > Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027 > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]> > wrote: > I'm evaluating one of these at the moment and am interested to know if others > have got it working with Nuke nicely, meaning, have you been able to really > utilise the insane bandwidth of this card to massively accelerate any part of > your day to day compositing? > > So far, I've found it has no benefit when localising all Reads in a somewhat > heavy comp, or even playing back a sequence of exr's or deep files, compared > to localised sequences on a 10K Raptor drive also in my workstation - > hopefully I'm missing something big though, this is day one after all. > > There may be real tangible benefits to putting the Nuke cache on it though - > I'll see how it goes. > > I'm also guessing that as gpu processing becomes more prevalent in Nuke that > we will see a real speed advantage handing data from a card like this > straight to the gpu. > > Thanks, > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > <crop-plate.jpg> > <crop-plate_areas.jpg> > <crop-plate_areas-edgeDetect.jpg> > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
