My tests show that 4444 by itself shouldn't produce these large-block
artefacts

What is the workflow? Are you decoding the QT directly in Nuke or is it
converted in-between. Which platform and quicktime version etc.




On 30 March 2013 05:43, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> It was the same here - shot directly in ProRes 444.
> No idea what though
>
>
> Howard
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Igor Majdandzic <[email protected]>
> *To:* 'Nuke user discussion' <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, 29 March 2013, 16:29
> *Subject:* AW: AW: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts
>
> Do you know what caused them?
>
> --
> igor majdandzic
> compositor |
> [email protected]
> BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com
>
> *Von:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Magno Borgo
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 29. März 2013 14:06
> *An:* Nuke user discussion
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts
>
> I've seen the exactly same artifacts when working on a film shot on Alexa.
> These are nasty specially when keying... same issue, shot directly in
> Proress 4444.
>
> Magno.
>
>
>
>
> We've been having some problems with noise on some footages from Alexa,
> but nothing remotely near to that.
>
> diogo
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Jonathan Egstad <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> No idea, but it looks an awful lot like filtering from a slight resize
> operation.
>
> -jonathan
>
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 5:29 PM, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> do you mean in camera? because that was from the original qt footage
>
> --
> igor majdandzic
> compositor |
> [email protected]
> BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com
>
> *Von:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Jonathan
> Egstad
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. März 2013 01:10
> *An:* Nuke user discussion
> *Cc:* Nuke user discussion
> *Betreff:* Re: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts
>
> Looks like a very  slight resize was done.
> -jonathan
>
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 4:56 PM, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
> we got footage from a shoot with Alexa being the camera. It was shot in
> ProRess 444. The problem is: The picture has some artifacts which confuse
> me the codec being 444. I attached some images which show some of the grain
> patterns. Is this normal?
>
> thx,
>                 Igor
>
>
>
> --
> igor majdandzic
> compositor |
> [email protected]
> BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com
>
> *Von:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
> *Im Auftrag von *Deke Kincaid
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 27. März 2013 23:47
> *An:* Nuke user discussion
> *Betreff:* Re: [Nuke-users] FusionI/O and Nuke
>
> Hi Michael
> I'm actually testing this right now as Fusionio just gave us a bunch of
> them.  Early tests reveal that with dpx it's awesome but with openexr zip
> compressed file it it is spending more time with compression, not sure if
> it is cpu bound or what(needs more study but its slower).  Openexr
> uncompressed files though are considerably superfast but of course the
> issue is that it is 18 meg a frame.  These are single layer rgba exr files.
>
> -----
> Deke Kincaid
> Creative Specialist
> The Foundry
> Mobile: (310) 883 4313
> Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516
>
> The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd.
> Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> I'm evaluating one of these at the moment and am interested to know if
> others have got it working with Nuke nicely, meaning, have you been able to
> really utilise the insane bandwidth of this card to massively accelerate
> any part of your day to day compositing?
>
> So far, I've found it has no benefit when localising all Reads in a
> somewhat heavy comp, or even playing back a sequence of exr's or deep
> files, compared to localised sequences on a 10K Raptor drive also in my
> workstation - hopefully I'm missing something big though, this is day one
> after all.
>
> There may be real tangible benefits to putting the Nuke cache on it though
> - I'll see how it goes.
>
> I'm also guessing that as gpu processing becomes more prevalent in Nuke
> that we will see a real speed advantage handing data from a card like this
> straight to the gpu.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> <crop-plate.jpg>
>
> <crop-plate_areas.jpg>
>
> <crop-plate_areas-edgeDetect.jpg>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> Magno Borgo
> www.boundaryvfx.com
> www.borgo.tv
> Brasil:Curitiba:GMT= -3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to