No, you’re right. 7.0v6 also has at least one regression as well, though it 
will only cause problems for people doing specific things with Python. At this 
point, 7.0v5 seems to the best choice for a 7.0 release.

-Nathan



From: Richard Bobo 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:06 PM
To: Nuke user discussion 
Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke 7.0v3 or 7.0v1 ?

Ari,


I believe that 7.0v3 was pulled from distribution with a semi-serious bug. You 
should go to 7.0v4 or higher. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong...


Rich



Rich Bobo 
Senior VFX Compositor
Armstrong-White
http://armstrong-white.com/

Email:  [email protected]
Mobile:  (248) 840-2665
Web:  http://richbobo.com/


"A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in the wrong, which is 
but saying that he is wiser today than he was yesterday."
- Alexander Pope (1688-1744) English Poet





On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:54 PM, [email protected] wrote:


  We're considering rolling out Nuke 7.0v3, but I'm curious if there was
  anything major which makes 7.0v1 a better choice for now ?

  Also, has there been a fix to the file browser's change for numbered files ?
  ie. our proprietary file format has no prefix nor suffix, only numbered
  frames. As of Nuke7's release, the file browser won't display numbered
  files (sans prefix/suffix) as singular sequences.  This presents a major
  workflow inconvenience where the comper has to explicity set the frame
  range in and out in every read node.  Multiply that times over 1,700 shots
  in a film... and oy.

  thx,
  Ari
  Blue Sky

  _______________________________________________
  Nuke-users mailing list
  [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
  http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to