I'm sure you could get around it with python. Have the artist launch a script to set start and end frames. Sure, it's an extra step but you wouldn't need to roll out a new version.
19 apr 2013 kl. 23:06 skrev [email protected]: > so 7.0v5 is the contender... thanks for the feedback. > > Anyone aware of the file-browser issue though ? or have a custom read > node as a work around ? > > thx, > Ari > > >> No, you’re right. 7.0v6 also has at least one regression as well, though >> it will only cause problems for people doing specific things with Python. >> At this point, 7.0v5 seems to the best choice for a 7.0 release. >> >> -Nathan >> >> >> >> From: Richard Bobo >> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:06 PM >> To: Nuke user discussion >> Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke 7.0v3 or 7.0v1 ? >> >> Ari, >> >> >> I believe that 7.0v3 was pulled from distribution with a semi-serious bug. >> You should go to 7.0v4 or higher. Someone please correct me if I'm >> wrong... >> >> >> Rich >> >> >> >> Rich Bobo >> Senior VFX Compositor >> Armstrong-White >> http://armstrong-white.com/ >> >> Email: [email protected] >> Mobile: (248) 840-2665 >> Web: http://richbobo.com/ >> >> >> "A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in the wrong, which >> is but saying that he is wiser today than he was yesterday." >> - Alexander Pope (1688-1744) English Poet >> >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:54 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> We're considering rolling out Nuke 7.0v3, but I'm curious if there was >> anything major which makes 7.0v1 a better choice for now ? >> >> Also, has there been a fix to the file browser's change for numbered >> files ? >> ie. our proprietary file format has no prefix nor suffix, only numbered >> frames. As of Nuke7's release, the file browser won't display numbered >> files (sans prefix/suffix) as singular sequences. This presents a major >> workflow inconvenience where the comper has to explicity set the frame >> range in and out in every read node. Multiply that times over 1,700 >> shots >> in a film... and oy. >> >> thx, >> Ari >> Blue Sky >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users_______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
