1. 'no QA' I read that Foundry have 120 engineers & QA's working: http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/products/maintenance/
2. 'Maintenance fee' you don't actually need to pay it if you don't want to- the software will keep working for what you have paid for. My take on bugs in software is just as all 3d/2d work needs revisions/iterations, all software needs revisions i.e. bug fixing. Software programming is an art-form and at no time in history has software worked perfectly e.g.have you read the famous IBM OS/360 development in the 60's, even with so many resources it went many hundred of millions of dollars over budget and was late, and, needed many bug fixes to become stable. This is software development in a nutshell. The best solution to running the most stable software is to use older versions that have been thoroughly battle-tested. i.e. Nuke 6.3v9 On 20 April 2013 09:50, Gustaf Nilsson <[email protected]> wrote: > . not having to do any QA/testing on their own and 2. having their > customers hooked on the maintenance fee >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
