Eh? They have a QA department?!? However the best way to find bugs is unfortunately through running shots through the software with all the inherent risks.
Howard On 19 Apr 2013, at 22:50, Gustaf Nilsson <[email protected]> wrote: > i found 7.0v5 much more stable than the previous iterations of nuke 7 - still > full of hilarious* bugs tho. I guess the foundry are killing two birds in one > stone by 1. not having to do any QA/testing on their own and 2. having their > customers hooked on the maintenance fee > > (*not actually hilarious if you are on a deadline) > > G > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Elias Ericsson Rydberg > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm sure you could get around it with python. Have the artist launch a >> script to set start and end frames. Sure, it's an extra step but you >> wouldn't need to roll out a new version. >> >> 19 apr 2013 kl. 23:06 skrev [email protected]: >> >> > so 7.0v5 is the contender... thanks for the feedback. >> > >> > Anyone aware of the file-browser issue though ? or have a custom read >> > node as a work around ? >> > >> > thx, >> > Ari >> > >> > >> >> No, you’re right. 7.0v6 also has at least one regression as well, though >> >> it will only cause problems for people doing specific things with Python. >> >> At this point, 7.0v5 seems to the best choice for a 7.0 release. >> >> >> >> -Nathan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Richard Bobo >> >> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:06 PM >> >> To: Nuke user discussion >> >> Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke 7.0v3 or 7.0v1 ? >> >> >> >> Ari, >> >> >> >> >> >> I believe that 7.0v3 was pulled from distribution with a semi-serious bug. >> >> You should go to 7.0v4 or higher. Someone please correct me if I'm >> >> wrong... >> >> >> >> >> >> Rich >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Rich Bobo >> >> Senior VFX Compositor >> >> Armstrong-White >> >> http://armstrong-white.com/ >> >> >> >> Email: [email protected] >> >> Mobile: (248) 840-2665 >> >> Web: http://richbobo.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> "A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in the wrong, which >> >> is but saying that he is wiser today than he was yesterday." >> >> - Alexander Pope (1688-1744) English Poet >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:54 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> We're considering rolling out Nuke 7.0v3, but I'm curious if there was >> >> anything major which makes 7.0v1 a better choice for now ? >> >> >> >> Also, has there been a fix to the file browser's change for numbered >> >> files ? >> >> ie. our proprietary file format has no prefix nor suffix, only numbered >> >> frames. As of Nuke7's release, the file browser won't display numbered >> >> files (sans prefix/suffix) as singular sequences. This presents a major >> >> workflow inconvenience where the comper has to explicity set the frame >> >> range in and out in every read node. Multiply that times over 1,700 >> >> shots >> >> in a film... and oy. >> >> >> >> thx, >> >> Ari >> >> Blue Sky >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Nuke-users mailing list >> >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Nuke-users mailing list >> >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users_______________________________________________ >> >> Nuke-users mailing list >> >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > -- > ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
