>> Anyone have the bug number for that regression or the file browser issue?
Sounds very similar to Bug ID 30168, with the file browser not identifying sequences of certain file types (like dtex). That one got resolved during the beta, but it sounds like having no file extension at all leads to the same behaviour. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> wrote: > Assist us the Roto/paint version of nuke you get 2 copies of with NukeX. > Though as you said you may have so many lics it doesn't matter. > > > http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/articles/2013/03/18/496/assist-tool-for-nukex-available-now/ > > Easier to see what nodes are enabled in the release notes. > > http://thefoundry.s3.amazonaws.com/products/nuke/releases/7.0v6/Nuke_7.0v6_ReleaseNotes.pdf > > Anyone have the bug number for that regression or the file browser issue? > > -deke > > On Monday, April 22, 2013, wrote: > >> hey Deke, >> >> refresh my memory on the assist seats ? might that help such a large >> group when we already have such a large base of licenses ? >> >> and what say you regarding any prominent 7.0v6 issues ? >> >> Lastly, do you know if the file browser issue with displaying numbered >> files as sequences is still, an issue ? (recall we have a proprietary >> image format that only has numbers as filenames, no prefix/suffix at >> all)... as of Nuke7 the file browser changed. This would cause all >> artists to manually set the start/end frames explicitly in the read node >> as a result. >> >> thx, >> Ari >> Blue Sky >> >> >> > The big thing your missing out on 7.0v6 is the extra Assist seats for >> any >> > NukeX lics you have. I'm not sure if that matters much to you guys >> > though. >> > >> > -deke >> > >> > >> > >> > On Monday, April 22, 2013, wrote: >> > >> >> so we saying 7.0v5 is the latest 'dependable' version ? >> >> anyone have a particular issue with 7.0v5 ? last call for us. >> >> >> >> thx for the notes thus far... big help >> >> >> >> Ari >> >> Blue Sky >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > No, you’re right. 7.0v6 also has at least one regression as well, >> >> though >> >> > it will only cause problems for people doing specific things with >> >> Python. >> >> > At this point, 7.0v5 seems to the best choice for a 7.0 release. >> >> > >> >> > -Nathan >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > From: Richard Bobo >> >> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:06 PM >> >> > To: Nuke user discussion >> >> > Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke 7.0v3 or 7.0v1 ? >> >> > >> >> > Ari, >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I believe that 7.0v3 was pulled from distribution with a semi-serious >> >> bug. >> >> > You should go to 7.0v4 or higher. Someone please correct me if I'm >> >> > wrong... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Rich >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Rich Bobo >> >> > Senior VFX Compositor >> >> > Armstrong-White >> >> > http://armstrong-white.com/ >> >> > >> >> > Email: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> >> > Mobile: (248) 840-2665 >> >> > Web: http://richbobo.com/ >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > "A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in the wrong, >> >> which >> >> > is but saying that he is wiser today than he was yesterday." >> >> > - Alexander Pope (1688-1744) English Poet >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Apr 19, 2013, at 3:54 PM, [email protected] <javascript:;> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > We're considering rolling out Nuke 7.0v3, but I'm curious if there >> >> was >> >> > anything major which makes 7.0v1 a better choice for now ? >> >> > >> >> > Also, has there been a fix to the file browser's change for >> numbered >> >> > files ? >> >> > ie. our proprietary file format has no prefix nor suffix, only >> >> numbered >> >> > frames. As of Nuke7's release, the file browser won't display >> >> numbered >> >> > files (sans prefix/suffix) as singular sequences. This presents a >> >> major >> >> > workflow inconvenience where the comper has to explicity set the >> >> frame >> >> > range in and out in every read node. Multiply that times over >> 1,700 >> >> > shots >> >> > in a film... and oy. >> >> > >> >> > thx, >> >> > Ari >> >> > Blue Sky >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> >> > [email protected] <javascript:;>, >> >> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> >> > >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> >> > [email protected] <javascript:;>, >> >> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> >> > >> >> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users_______________________________________________ >> >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> >> > [email protected] <javascript:;>, >> >> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Nuke-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] <javascript:;>, >> >> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > ----- >> > Deke Kincaid >> > Creative Specialist >> > The Foundry >> > Mobile: (310) 883 4313 >> > Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516 >> > >> > The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd. >> > Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > > -- > ----- > Deke Kincaid > Creative Specialist > The Foundry > Mobile: (310) 883 4313 > Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516 > > The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd. > Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027 > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
