It's easy to become sligthly obsessed with using channels instead of exposing them in the node graph. If you find a good compromise feel free to share! At the moment I'm convinced that exposing in the node graph is the way to go.
Cheers, Elias Ericsson Rydberg 23 maj 2013 kl. 10:34 skrev "MonkeyBwoy" <[email protected]>: > Hi Elias, > > thanks for your input! > > Actually the way you recommend is the way that I used to work most of the > time. I thought that creating roto and storing them in the channel-stream > might be a more nifty and "nuke'ish" way to tackle this job. In the past I > often found myself with a very big nodegraph with lots of rotos spinning in > all directions with different channel operations. I thought that it might be > more clearly. Otherwise I get your point that it is helpful to really see > what you are doing when there are actual roto-nodes going directly into grade > and cc nodes. > > Don't know...I might try both options on this. > > Cheers > > S. > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
