Totally agree. Just because we are more flexible in post has created a culture of creative micro management that is equivalent to man handling actors on set rather than letting them act



On 3/21/14, 12:25 PM, matt estela wrote:

On 21 March 2014 10:09, Elias Ericsson Rydberg <elias.ericsson.rydb...@gmail.com> wrote:
In all kinds of productions there seems to be a heavy reliance on the director. That's the standard I guess. Should not we, the vfx-artists, be the authority of our own domain?


I do wonder if non cg fx heavy films of the past were as reliant on director approval as they are today. Using raiders as the example again, was Spielberg really approving every rock, every mine cart that was created for the mine chase sequence, sending shots back 10, 50, 100 times for revisions? Or as I suspect, was there the simple reality of 'we need to make these things, that takes time, you really can't change much once we start shooting miniatures.'? The ability for digital to change anything and everything is both the best and worst thing that happened to post production.




_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users


_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to