http://www3.pny.com/NVIDIA-Quadro-K6000-SDI-font-colordc0431Newfont-P3430C366.aspx

On Apr 8, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote:

> Quadro sdi is dead.  The have stopped making it. 
> 
> On Apr 8, 2014 6:43 PM, "Chris Noellert" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed, the Quadro SDI option would arguably be best, given the amount of 
> Flames in the world that could be immediately retooled to run both softwares 
> and given that this machine would be the one which would be delivering 
> things, quicktime support on Lunix becomes more and more of an issue.
> 
> Here’s one that I just thought of, does Nuke studio share the same level of 
> project compatibility as Heiro so that a show that’s completed in the front 
> room, can be passed off to the back room or assistant for deliverables and 
> versions.  This would be a fairly nice way to get around some of that codec 
> malarky that we will all face on Linux.
> 
> Best,
> Chris  
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 8, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Nathan Rusch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> A few immediate questions:
>> - Will it support proper SDI stereo output (for projection, etc.)? I’d love 
>> to assume yes, but then there’s Hiero...
>> - What are the plans for approaching Quicktime codec support on Linux (audio 
>> and video)? It’s a problem I hate thinking about, but it will come up.
>> - Chris touched on this, but is there work being done on the caching and 
>> playback components? Even HieroPlayer has trouble maintaining consistent 
>> playback frame rates, especially compared to something like RV.
>> - It would be fantastic if Quadro SDI cards were supported as output 
>> devices...
>>  
>> -Nathan
>> 
>>  
>> From: Chris Noellert
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 3:17 PM
>> To: Nuke user discussion
>> Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] nuke studio
>>  
>> Deke,
>>  
>> My questions are of a more utilitarian nature.  Given how immediate clients 
>> want to see feedback, how robust is the caching at this point?  I found 
>> Nuke's caching somewhat frustrating at times and albeit I've only used Heiro 
>> a handful of times but even then it often felt like things weren't as smooth 
>> as just pushing play.  It might be time for me just to revisit Heiro to get 
>> a sense of things.
>>  
>> Then there's audio and sdi monitoring.  Is Nuke studio setup for monitoring 
>> 5.1 as well as stereo out of a Blackmagic or Aja board embedded? 
>>  
>> Regarding versioning, I love the versioning on the timeline for clips but is 
>> it possible for timelines to have versions themselves?  For instance being 
>> able to quickly version up and down between different grades on multiple 
>> shots at a single keystroke. 
>>  
>> I'm keen to play.  There's so many things I'm curious about.
>>  
>> Best,
>> Chris
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Apr 8, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Fabian Fischer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> You just made my day!
>>> 
>>> Am 08.04.2014 22:38, schrieb Deke Kincaid:
>>>> Hi Doug
>>>>  
>>>> If you own both NukeX + Hiero and under current maintenance when it ships 
>>>> then we are giving a complementary upgrade to Nuke Studio and you get to 
>>>> keep your separate Hiero license.  The second method is if you own the new 
>>>> Production Collective then you also get the complementary upgrade.
>>>>  
>>>> -----
>>>> Deke Kincaid
>>>> Creative Specialist
>>>> The Foundry
>>>> Mobile: (310) 883 4313
>>>> Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tuesday, April 8, 2014, Doug Wilkinson 
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> wrote:
>>>> My INITIAL reaction is that the announcement they made was an upgraded 
>>>> version of Hiero, with the ability to run nukeX as an integrated engine. 
>>>> This is what we thought, based on face to face foundry meetings, Hiero was 
>>>> becoming, not nuke.  I think this is a great announcement, don't get me 
>>>> wrong! I'm just very confused by this announcement and how The Foundry 
>>>> chose to label and market this product. 
>>>>  
>>>> Some other questions that I look forward to being answered, in time :
>>>> Why can't we use nuke as the engine, why only nukeX? (surely only some of 
>>>> us need the functionality of nukeX in this scenario)
>>>> What features will be rolled into Hiero?
>>>> What would be the pricing for current customers on maintenance that own 
>>>> both Hiero and NukeX? 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Gary Jaeger <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> So that seems to overlap quite a bit with Hiero. Is Hiero to be replaced 
>>>> by Nuke Studio?
>>>>  
>>>> On Apr 7, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> We have the video up here:
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> Gary Jaeger // Core Studio
>>>> 249 Princeton Avenue
>>>> Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
>>>> 650 728 7060
>>>> http://corestudio.com
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> --
>>>> Deke Kincaid
>>>> Creative Specialist
>>>> The Foundry
>>>> Skype: dekekincaid
>>>> Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Mobile: (310) 883 4313
>>>> Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk
>>>> Email: [email protected] 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to