Hey all - does it really matter if:

we get the email
we reply to the email and everyone gets it.
the 'community' gets the email
if you reply online in the 'community' you get the email.

sort of like the list with the benefit of the online 'community' and the list being able to talk to each other, unlike how the forum worked when I'd send something online and it never ended up on the list so there were never any replies. The forum sucked, so it's good they are changing it.

I don't know what this new 'community' setup is yet (too tired to look at it at the moment), but if it allows me to keep my inbox folders with nuke-python and nuke-users and still get and reply to the posts, I'm not going to see a difference and won't care. That questions and replies end up online and reply-able from online would be a bonus.

But hey - if everyone here jumps ship it's not going to be a 'community' at all.

JRAB


On 2/4/15 8:04 PM, Julik Tarkhanov wrote:
No just probably the same Corporate Suit who tried to force Area on flame users without there being any actual merit to doing so now works for the Foundry and is trying his thing there.

On 03 Feb 2015, at 18:56, Nathan Dunsworth <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Look this is obv The Foundry not understanding the workflow of email and mailing lists and the differences with how forums work.

--
Julik Tarkhanov | HecticElectric | Keizersgracht 736 1017 EX
Amsterdam | The Netherlands | tel. +31 20 330 8250
cel. +31 61 145 06 36 | http://hecticelectric.nl



_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to