+1 I am also voicing out to keep the mailing list. Great to see all the topics in one place showing just the headlines rather than clicking though different things. That's the new setup or the old forum? Yes, that behavior is useless, like the old forum. I was hoping the new 'community' setup would behave more like a support ticket with Tweak - I send a ticket (email support or go to the web interface) and I get a mail. I can reply with the mail or the web, except in this case it would be public. That's all I want out of it. I could then search my mail or the web interface. Anything more than that wastes my time and makes it less useful. If the new 'community' doesn't behave that way, I'm ready to sign onto the google version.
The only value a forum (or the new setup) has for me is the ability to search through the history from before I signed on. Whatever they do, I hope the list archives get transferred. JRAB On 2/5/15 12:30 AM, Randy Little wrote: You only get a response if you have the time to go dig through a forum in the first place. The forum doesn't just email me through some AI that knows what it thinks I want to read. On Feb 4, 2015 2:39 PM, "John RA Benson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all - does it really matter if: > > we get the email > we reply to the email and everyone gets it. > the 'community' gets the email > if you reply online in the 'community' you get the email. > > sort of like the list with the benefit of the online 'community' and the > list being able to talk to each other, unlike how the forum worked when I'd > send something online and it never ended up on the list so there were never > any replies. The forum sucked, so it's good they are changing it. > > I don't know what this new 'community' setup is yet (too tired to look at > it at the moment), but if it allows me to keep my inbox folders with > nuke-python and nuke-users and still get and reply to the posts, I'm not > going to see a difference and won't care. That questions and replies end up > online and reply-able from online would be a bonus. > > But hey - if everyone here jumps ship it's not going to be a 'community' > at all. > > JRAB > > > On 2/4/15 8:04 PM, Julik Tarkhanov wrote: > > No just probably the same Corporate Suit who tried to force Area on flame > users without there being > any actual merit to doing so now works for the Foundry and is trying his > thing there. > > On 03 Feb 2015, at 18:56, Nathan Dunsworth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Look this is obv The Foundry not understanding the workflow of email and > mailing lists and the differences with how forums work. > > > -- > Julik Tarkhanov | HecticElectric | Keizersgracht 736 1017 EX > Amsterdam | The Netherlands | tel. +31 20 330 8250 > <%2B31%C2%A020%20330%208250> > cel. +31 61 145 06 36 | http://hecticelectric.nl > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing [email protected], > http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
