I agree with what Frank says.

In any case, there is already a VFX StackExchange-like thing going on:
www.vfxoverflow.com and even a subbreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/nukevfx

I would post this annoucement there too, to reach a wider user base.

Thanks Aaron.

./charlie



On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com> wrote:

> I love StackExchange and it's self monitored nature and set of rules
> ensure high quality questions and answers, and an easy way to find the
> answer to a question that has already been posed.
> People that are too lazy to do their own homework/research and expect
> spoon feeding from others instead will have a hard time there, which helps
> improve the quality of questions/answers immensely.
> StackExchange is far superior to the current forums/mailing lists for sure.
>
> However, my main concern would be to have another parallel community to
> the user list and forum, and thus dilute information flow further (the
> reason I refused to have a forum on Nukepedia even though I was badgered
> plenty of times to do it).
>
> Ideally I'd love a stack exchange type of quality in the official forum,
> but right now we are already struggling with having a mailing list and
> forum parallel to each other, with only the forum being the "official"
> channel, which has already caused loss of information along the way.
>
> So, ironically, I'd recommend posting this on the "official" forum rather
> than the mailing list, to see if the Foundry have thoughts on this as well.
> It would be awesome to reconcile the community channels into one
> StackExchange format.
>
> Thanks for bringing this up!
>
> frank
>
>
>
> On 25/02/16 12:37 pm, aaron barclay wrote:
>
> Hey Nuke list,
>
> There is an effort going on to get a Stack Exchange site off the ground
> for Nuke. If you are familiar with Stack Exchange you might agree it is a
> pretty good fit for a home of technical questions (and answers) and could
> be a great resource for nuke in the future to complement those already out
> there.
>
> Those not familiar may wish to check out some of the other sites in the
> stack exchange network to get a feel for what they are.
>
> Some examples:
>
> <http://stackoverflow.com/>http://stackoverflow.com/
>
> <http://video.stackexchange.com/>http://video.stackexchange.com/
>
> <http://blender.stackexchange.com/>http://blender.stackexchange.com/
>
> <http://math.stackexchange.com/>http://math.stackexchange.com/
>
> Read the stack exchange wikipedia:
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Exchange>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Exchange
>
> Right now the proposal is in definition stage and needs some people to
> follow the proposal as well as join in shaping questions and voting. The
> whole thing needs an active community to get it going. If you think this
> might be useful jump in and get involved and *pass it on*!
>
> No one person owns or controls this site, the types of questions and
> topics it covers is up to the community. It can cover all levels, beginner
> to advanced. It is completely open to mould the types of questions that are
> relevant. C++ Ndk? Compositing technique? Python API? Colour questions etc.
>
> Its a cross between reddit, wikipedia and forums.
>
> The FAQ is worth reading because the process is a little confusing.
>
> <http://area51.stackexchange.com/faq>http://area51.stackexchange.com/faq
>
> The site is not real at the moment, the questions are hypothetical. It is
> a proposal, in definition stage where the questions and votes that are made
> now shape the general direction of the site, and none of the questions
> should actually be answered just yet. However, if enough people think this
> might have value and get involved we can jump to interesting part of
> answering the questions.
>
> And the site is here.
>
>
> <http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/95622/visual-effects-compositing-using-foundry-nuke?referrer=3ZW-oXGJPA-HpP1YR-b4RA2>
> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/95622/visual-effects-compositing-using-foundry-nuke?referrer=3ZW-oXGJPA-HpP1YR-b4RA2
>
> Visual effects compositing using the foundry nuke.
>
> Yes, I think the name is terrible as well. Sign up and start a discussion
> to get it changed.
>
> aaron.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing listnuke-us...@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> --
> [image: ohufxLogo 50x50] <http://www.ohufx.com>
>
> *vfx for storytellers <http://www.ohufx.com> *
>
> *vfx compositing <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-compositing> | workflow
> customisation & consulting <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-customising>*
> * W E L L I N G T O N    |    N E W   Z E A L A N D *
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to