I have to agree with Frank as well. I love StackExchange, and keep an eye on the 'nuke' tag on StackOverflow (among other things), but I don't think the community would really benefit from being any more fragmented, even if it would be adding a really nice platform to the mix. People already post the same questions to both StackOverflow and the Foundry forums on occasion, which means answering them sometimes turns out to be a waste of time.
I also have to agree that many people's use of the community resources don't align with the StackExchange ethos of doing your due diligence before asking questions. Rather we get the same basic questions repeated (and answered) over and over again because people can't be bothered to do a little leg work. I think it would be great if the existing community forums were migrated to StackExchange, but I'm not very optimistic about something like that happening. -Nathan From: Frank Rueter|OHUfx Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:14 PM To: nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal I love StackExchange and it's self monitored nature and set of rules ensure high quality questions and answers, and an easy way to find the answer to a question that has already been posed. People that are too lazy to do their own homework/research and expect spoon feeding from others instead will have a hard time there, which helps improve the quality of questions/answers immensely. StackExchange is far superior to the current forums/mailing lists for sure. However, my main concern would be to have another parallel community to the user list and forum, and thus dilute information flow further (the reason I refused to have a forum on Nukepedia even though I was badgered plenty of times to do it). Ideally I'd love a stack exchange type of quality in the official forum, but right now we are already struggling with having a mailing list and forum parallel to each other, with only the forum being the "official" channel, which has already caused loss of information along the way. So, ironically, I'd recommend posting this on the "official" forum rather than the mailing list, to see if the Foundry have thoughts on this as well. It would be awesome to reconcile the community channels into one StackExchange format. Thanks for bringing this up! frank On 25/02/16 12:37 pm, aaron barclay wrote: Hey Nuke list, There is an effort going on to get a Stack Exchange site off the ground for Nuke. If you are familiar with Stack Exchange you might agree it is a pretty good fit for a home of technical questions (and answers) and could be a great resource for nuke in the future to complement those already out there. Those not familiar may wish to check out some of the other sites in the stack exchange network to get a feel for what they are. Some examples: http://stackoverflow.com/ http://video.stackexchange.com/ http://blender.stackexchange.com/ http://math.stackexchange.com/ Read the stack exchange wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Exchange Right now the proposal is in definition stage and needs some people to follow the proposal as well as join in shaping questions and voting. The whole thing needs an active community to get it going. If you think this might be useful jump in and get involved and pass it on! No one person owns or controls this site, the types of questions and topics it covers is up to the community. It can cover all levels, beginner to advanced. It is completely open to mould the types of questions that are relevant. C++ Ndk? Compositing technique? Python API? Colour questions etc. Its a cross between reddit, wikipedia and forums. The FAQ is worth reading because the process is a little confusing. http://area51.stackexchange.com/faq The site is not real at the moment, the questions are hypothetical. It is a proposal, in definition stage where the questions and votes that are made now shape the general direction of the site, and none of the questions should actually be answered just yet. However, if enough people think this might have value and get involved we can jump to interesting part of answering the questions. And the site is here. http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/95622/visual-effects-compositing-using-foundry-nuke?referrer=3ZW-oXGJPA-HpP1YR-b4RA2 Visual effects compositing using the foundry nuke. Yes, I think the name is terrible as well. Sign up and start a discussion to get it changed. aaron. _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users -- vfx for storytellers vfx compositing | workflow customisation & consulting W E L L I N G T O N | N E W Z E A L A N D
PNG IHDR 2 2 ?± tEXtSoftware Adobe ImageReadyqÉe<