10.5 looked like it broke some Studio project compatibility thing, so they probably decided on the point release just to soften the blow for breaking backwards compatibility. You probably have to make a new version when you break compatibility like that, or people wonder why 10v6 proj's won't open in 10v5.
But yeah, otherwise not much in there. 10.1 might have been a better call to fall in line with how software is usually versioned? but it's nitpicking. The whole plugin recompiling thing is a big problem. Someone could probably get all the plugin folks rounded up (aren't that many, really) and organize them to all be on the alpha or beta so their stuff is ready to go day of release, but it'd take some resource that I'm not sure Foundry has right now. On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless the software is free, ie Unreal, public roadmaps on commercial > software is pretty non-existent. > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Marty Blumen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thx! Bummer though, a public roadmap could be needed too. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 10/12/2016, at 9:13 AM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Most of us sign NDA's and can't talk about this. The Foundry typically >> only talks about this when they visit in person to get feedback on it. >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is there a roadmap for Nuke? 'Maintenance' is coming around and v10.5 >>> doesn't appear to do too much. v11 is already in the bug tracker for some >>> bug resolvements; Roto++ is a disparate Foundry development that supersedes >>> Nuke's tech; 'Lead Software Engineer - Nuke Engine' kind of sounds like >>> Houdini Engine. etc. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
