On 5/15/07, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Charles R Harris apparently wrote: > What I would like it to look like, except for the type > stuff, is attached. Ooof! Aside from obviously agreeing with the location of notes and examples, I have to say, the readability of your example is greatly reduced from the epydoc default! Specifically, I would restore the background colors and restore bold to the headings. (I would agree bold is not needed/desirable for the function names in the Function Details.)
They are there and show up here, but I couldn't upload the whole generated documentation because of the mailing list limit on the size of posts. The lack of colorization for the doctest example in the html generated from HOWTO is real, however, the code needs to be indented. Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
