On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Eventually, I think we're going to end up with three lists (at least): > > nupic-users > nupic-theory > nupic-hackers > > However, splitting is an irreversible action, so I'm hesitant to do a > three-way split right now. I'm OK with either, though would prefer 3-way split. Users can always (ub)subscribe to multiple lists. Good to see this happening. Fergal has a good point that new users will > likely be interested in the theory, so they could benefit from reading > those discussions, and it could inspire them in their usage of NuPIC. > > Creating a development list is essential at this point, though. I'd > like to only split once right now, and we'll always have the option to > split again. > > "[nupic-hackers]": [email protected] > "[nupic-discuss]": [email protected] > > This assumes that *this* list will change names from [nupic-dev] to > [nupic-discuss], and all development conversations will continue on > the new [nupic-hackers] list. > > If I start getting feedback that there is too much theory or technical > usage discussions happening on the main list, I'll propose another > split. > > I'm planning on making this split and announcing the details tomorrow. > > --------- > Matt Taylor > OS Community Flag-Bearer > Numenta > > > > -- Marek Otahal :o)
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
