Same here. On Mar 7, 2014 8:43 AM, "Jeff Fohl" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would subscribe to the theory ML, but I am ambivalent as to whether it > is necessary or not. > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are 260 non-digest members of this list, and so far 7 have >> expressed interest in a nupic-theory ML. I feel like we need more >> people to chime in to say they'd sign up. I would hate to have a ML >> with only 7 people subscribed. I'll leave this thread open for a bit >> for the digest subscribers to have a chance to read it. >> --------- >> Matt Taylor >> OS Community Flag-Bearer >> Numenta >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Aseem Hegshetye <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > Yes please.. !!! this is an awesome idea.. I really want some place to >> discuss algorithms !! >> > Thanks >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nupic mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
