> Plus i am very sure its a different kind of AI revolution which will always be remembered.. its too effective and too simple.. most dont believe it in, but its ok.. no one believed newton too ;)
Yes, I do believe on that.. Because this I and others work hard on this project even being volunteers.. On 16 April 2014 18:00, Aseem Hegshetye <[email protected]> wrote: > I would be ok if some one else would hav invented CLA as effectively as > Jeff did.. But very few people would have thought of making it open sourced. > If it was private, like vicarious, I would have never been able to enjoy > my work as much as I do now. > Plus i am very sure its a different kind of AI revolution which will > always be remembered.. its too effective and too simple.. > most dont believe it in, but its ok.. no one believed newton too ;) > ps we will soon have a chat bot build out of CLA. Its close to finish. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Ragazzi" <[email protected]> > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:12:50 PM > Subject: Re: [nupic-discuss] Curious > > > > I'll play the devil advocate here.. hehe > > > What if Einstein had decided being a life insurance salesman (indeed this > was his B plan)? Necessarily other person could reach the same conclusion > about Relativity as there're more people thinking about physics.. > > > I think Jeff just accelerated the process as he didn't see any relevant > moviment to design a framework for intelligence.. So I think that a global > framework woud be a matter of time.. Indeed already there're some atempts > about.. Chris Eliasmith's papers are a good example.. > > > However t his does not take away the merit of Hawkins .. His work is > extremally valuable and cutting edge .. What I mean is that one time or > another , a good framewrok could appear .. It could take years , could take > decades .. > > > > On 16 April 2014 15:54, Viraj Sinha < [email protected] > wrote: > > > > > I know Jeff's come out and said that he felt neuroscience wasn't ready for > what he wanted to work on when he decided to go into mobile computing > first. The field matured, and Jeff gained capital and influence in the mean > while . > > - viraj > > For what it's worth, I'd subscribe to a nupic-fanboy list. > On Apr 16, 2014 2:45 PM, "Archie, Kevin" < [email protected] > wrote: > > > I'll go ahead and be crass: nothing was going to happen without the money. > I'm glad that Grok is getting real paying customers, but I imagine the burn > rate is still pretty crazy, so thanks to Jeff first for RNI (I know a few > people who were there, crazy smart and doing very nice work) and now Grok. > I don't know where NuPIC/CLA is going (In short: I'm skeptical but am > watching with great interest) but I admire the hell out of Jeff for putting > so much of his time and energy and, yes, money into this. > > - Kevin > > p.s. Did I just write that? Maybe we need a nupic-fanboy list. > > On Apr 16, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Pradeepto Bhattacharya wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Aseem Hegshetye > > < [email protected] > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> Where would CLA be today if Jeff Hawkins would not have done mobile > computing for 16 years !! > >> just curious > > > > Come to think of it, where would mobile computing be if Jeff hadn't > > done it for 16 years. Our lives are enriched today with many > > technologies thanks to Palm and Handspring. And today Jeff can spend > > time on NuPIC and CLA because I am sure he learnt a bunch of things > > there at Palm and Handspring - think Graffiti. And maybe even how to > > run a successful technology company. > > > > Also, in last 16 years, neuroscience and computing in general has gone > > ahead leaps and bounds. That does help as well, don't you think so? > > How much fun would it be to wait for models to be created on Pentium > > I/II boxes? ;) > > > > Regards, > > > > Pradeepto > > -- > > Pradeepto Kumar Bhattacharya > > KDE e.V. Board of Director | Proud KDE Contributor > > The KDE Project : http://www.kde.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nupic mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > ________________________________ > > The material in this message is private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be > advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any > action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately > notify the sender via telephone or return mail. > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > > > -- > > > > David Ragazzi > OS Community Commiter > Numenta.org > -- > "I think James Connolly , the Irish revolutionary , is right when he says > that the only prophets are those who make their future . So we're not > anticipating , we're working for it ." > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > -- David Ragazzi OS Community Commiter Numenta.org -- "I think James Connolly, the Irish revolutionary, is right when he says that the only prophets are those who make their future. So we're not anticipating , we're working for it."
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
