On 10/15/08, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I finally managed to have sometime to find out why NUT wasn't compiling... > autoreconf and not autoconf! > > Carlos, the patch fixed the problem and compiled flawless.
Great! > I would sugest these values for batvolts > > { 240, 1.75*120, 2.33*120, 1.75*120, 2.09*120, 0.0 }, /* Lacerda Titan > Black */ That array is mostly deprecated. It was a feeble attempt to provide for some defaults, but in the real world it is mostly useless. The way forward is to add "battvolts=x:y" to the compatibility list for the models where we know those values work. > BTW, the second UPS I have has a problem with NUT. It ignores the chars sent > to serial port if the time between char is greater than 60000 useconds. To > fix this, I reduced > > #define SEND_PACE 100000 /* interval between chars on send (usec) */ > > to 10000 > > Maybe this could be turned into a new parameter. The UPSes are the same make and model? That's strange behaviour... But I guess this could be another parameter... _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list Nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev