They are the same but with a different add-on. The logic part that answers
the serial command changes.

Regards,

2008/10/15 Carlos Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> On 10/15/08, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I finally managed to have sometime to find out why NUT wasn't
> compiling...
> > autoreconf and not autoconf!
> >
> > Carlos, the patch fixed the problem and compiled flawless.
>
> Great!
>
> > I would sugest these values for batvolts
> >
> > { 240, 1.75*120, 2.33*120, 1.75*120, 2.09*120,  0.0 },   /* Lacerda Titan
> > Black */
>
> That array is mostly deprecated. It was a feeble attempt to provide
> for some defaults, but in the real world it is mostly useless.
>
> The way forward is to add "battvolts=x:y" to the compatibility list
> for the models where we know those values work.
>
> > BTW, the second UPS I have has a problem with NUT. It ignores the chars
> sent
> > to serial port if the time between char is greater than 60000 useconds.
> To
> > fix this, I reduced
> >
> > #define SEND_PACE    100000  /* interval between chars on send (usec) */
> >
> > to 10000
> >
> > Maybe this could be turned into a new parameter.
>
> The UPSes are the same make and model? That's strange behaviour...
>
> But I guess this could be another parameter...
>



-- 
     Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
             ICQ: 19290419

I Know, "Where you wanted to go today",
   but I decided to stop here instead!
                       MS Windows
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
Nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev

Reply via email to