Thank Charles. I've bookmarked this and will try to experiment a bit. On Mon, 3 Jun 2024, 04:33 Charles Lepple via Nut-upsuser, < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2024, at 12:14 PM, Roger Price wrote: > > > >> Is the comment about offdelay (in red) correct / can this line be > eliminated?. > > > > My understanding is "yes", but others may have deeper knowledge. > > I don't have a ton of direct experience with this post-v2.7.4, but someone > else wrote this up for overriding battery.charge.low: > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2023-November/013481.html > > (There are a few other override/ignorelb write-ups in the list archives, > too. Unfortunately, DDG is not finding them and I just snagged the first > hit on Google.) > > The key is that any override.* variables without "ignorelb" are just > telling white lies to any clients connected to upsd, without any > corresponding change in behavior in the driver or UPS. With "ignorelb", you > are telling the driver to ignore the UPS-calculated LB signal, and > synthesize it using the override.* parameters. > > So I would either: > > 1) use offdelay and don't use override.battery.runtime.low > 2) use ignorelb and remove offdelay > > I am skeptical that a Phoenixtec-based UPS has fully configurable shutdown > thresholds, but that is probably based on very old information, and I would > love to be proven wrong.. > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsuser mailing list > [email protected] > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser >
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
