Lucy
The primary method of communication in the IETF is through discussion on
the list, not through the meetings.
The meetings are intended to progress exceptional issues, previously
discussed on the list, which need the additional bandwidth of a face to
face meeting.
If you have questions regarding the text in the framework, please ask them.
If you wish to propose additional or alternate text, please post it to
the list, so it can be discussed.
If there is consensus on proposed changes to a WG draft those changes
will be incoprorated in that draft.
Stewart
On 21/06/2012 23:24, Lucy yong wrote:
Some people especially operators may not have time to study the documents until
the meeting time. The meeting gives authors opportunity to explain and have f2f
discussions which may help the understanding. Otherwise, why does IETF have
regularly meetings yearly?
This is very new piece of work for many people, and other people want to think
and contribute. Such rapid processing is seen as intentionally steered by a
small set of people. That is the point.
Lucy
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Melinda
Shore
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-02
On 6/21/12 7:23 AM, Lucy yong wrote:
[[LY]] the latter is not the case absolutely in this WG. The WG want
to adopt two drafts (or more?) without having a first WG meeting
yet.
Why does the meeting matter?
Melinda
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
