Hi Lucy, Thanks for supporting this draft.
If you do have specific concerns about the draft content, we can discuss these on the list. But this would contradict your first sentence below... Note that changes in -02 are only related to terminology (expanded section) and the alignment of such terminology in the rest of the draft. I won't comment on your last emails about the process (which Stewart alrady addressed in his mail). But I'd ask that you change the subject of future emails wrt process in order not to confuse the list. Marc -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lucy yong Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:03 PM To: Benson Schliesser; [email protected] Cc: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); [email protected] Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-02 Hi Ben and Matt, I want to say that the draft is well written and thanks to authors. I support this work. I also want to raise a question regarding the WG process. Last IETF (IETF83) had NVo3 BOF.(I heard that was well done) NVo3 WG is just formed on May 1 2012. The framework draft 00 was just published in March 2012. The 02 uploaded recently has fair amount of changes from 01. Why do the WG want rapidly adopting the draft into WG draft. Are there some DC operator want this badly? It seems the time line in the charter is not the reason. Frankly, this set of works are pretty new to IETF people. It should give people more time to think and contribute. Regards, Lucy -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Benson Schliesser Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 4:51 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Matthew (Matthew) Bocci; [email protected] Subject: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-02 Dear NVO3 Participants - This message begins a two week Call for Adoption of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lasserre-nvo3-framework-02 by the NVO3 working group, ending on 02-July-2012. Please respond to the NVO3 mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval, along with any additional comments that might explain your position. Also, if any NVO3 participant is aware of IPR associated with this draft, please inform the mailing list and/or the NVO3 chairs. Thanks, -Benson & Matthew _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
