On 8/23/12 3:14 PM, Anoop Ghanwani wrote:
I have attended a WG meeting remotely and found that while it's mostly possible to follow what is happening, it is almost impossible to participate meaningfully. Jabber is too slow because often questions/answers require quick turn around and at least regular WG meetings move too quickly for that.
I've participated in working group sessions remotely dozens of times and I don't quite understand this comment. It's not as if you can just pipe up when the spirit moves you when you're in the room, either - you have to stand in line and wait your turn. There's not much multi-party discussion, either. Ultimately how successful remote participation is comes down to the attentiveness of the chairs, I think. Melinda _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
