Robert,
The issue is that two locations is not that much more useful than one.
While this approach would allow some to physically attend at one of the
two
locations (because of reduced travel time and cost), other remote participants
will
still be remote, because of other obligations or commitments.
Me, for example, because this interim is scheduled during an ITU-T
Plenary
meeting in Geneva. Somehow, I don't think you had Geneva in mind for one of the
two locations.
:-)
--
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert
Raszuk
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Anoop Ghanwani
Cc: Benson Schliesser; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nvo3] remote participation for NVO3 interim meeting
Hi Anoop,
Indeed I very much agree with you. In fact that is precisely the reason for
wild suggestion two host a real meeting in two locations + allow remote access.
Coordinating meaningful participation across two locations would be much easier
then across 100 individuals.
R.
> Not sure how the video would help, but...
>
> I have attended a WG meeting remotely and found that while it's mostly
> possible to follow what is happening, it is almost impossible to
> participate meaningfully. Jabber is too slow because often
> questions/answers require quick turn around and at least regular WG
> meetings move too quickly for that.
> For meaningful participation there would have to be an operator
> unmuting/muting participants for voice discussion.
>
> Anoop
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello Benson,
>>
>> I have a question .. perhaps no precedence one. Would it be feasible
>> to have the NVO3 interim meeting on the 20 September in both East and
>> West US cost locations interconnected by voice + video ?
>>
>> That way we could I think have a very good opportunity to gather in
>> both locations without need to travel across US for one day meeting
>> ... I think technology wise this could be done.
>>
>> Of course remote participation from any other location would be also
>> possible.
>>
>> Just a thought ...
>>
>> Best regards,
>> R.
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
