Melinda,

        My impression is that you have not seen a "tight agenda" yet.

        I'm aware that you have attended a number of IETF meetings.  I've seen 
your name a
time or two.  I have a fairly large crate full of T-shirts myself (I have been 
to ~35 IETF meetings,
starting in 1996).

        Clearly you and I do not attend very many of the same WG meetings.  
That's okay with
me and a big part of why the saying "you mileage may vary" comes up as often as 
it does in the
IETF.

        I've been to many WG meetings where the Chairs have said right up front 
that they 
have a very full Agenda and will decide based on timing whether they will allow 
questions to
be asked, at all.  I've also been to meetings where some of the presentations 
took longer than
the time the chairs allocated for them, so the line was again cut-off almost 
immediately.

        Again, usually, if there is a time constraint, the chairs will only ask 
about questions if
there is already a line.  And even then, they may tell the folks in line to 
take it to the list.

        I am happy to agree that your experience may be different, as long as 
you're happy
to agree that other folks experience may be different from you own.

        I also think this is a rather silly topic to be burning bandwidth on, 
so let's agree to 
disagree and drop it...

--
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Melinda Shore [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 11:12 AM
To: Eric Gray
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nvo3] remote participation for NVO3 interim meeting
Importance: High

On 8/24/12 6:55 AM, Eric Gray wrote:
>       Usually, if the agenda is tight, you need to be headed for the 
> microphone before a presenter is done, or the Chairs will move immediately on 
> to the next presentation.

"Usually?"  Really?  That hasn't been my experience.  The only thing that's 
been a concern in the past has been that if the line gets long it gets closed.  
What I've seen more often (I think) is that the chair asks whether or not there 
are any more questions before moving on to the next agenda item.

>       If you have attended very many IETF WG meetings,

One or two.

>        If you are the "jabber" scribe,

A time or ten.

Sorry, I think that people believe the objections they're raising are true, but 
while these things happen they're not usual.  And when they happen they're the 
result of poor chairing rather than something inherent in the medium.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to