This implies that both gpe LISP and legacy LISP may be used in the market. Is that true only IP-in-IP application need nonce feature? Mobility is important requirement for cloud applications, so gpe LISP needs to develop other solution for this feature? Sorry, this is a hard sale.
Regards, Lucy -----Original Message----- From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 10:56 AM To: Lucy yong Cc: Paul Quinn (paulq); [email protected] Subject: Re: [nvo3] New Version Notification for draft-quinn-vxlan-gpe-00.txt > Regarding to the protocol evolution, does this mean that nonce/map-version > features in LISP will be deprecated? IMO: Having the same field overloaded > for many difference purposes is not good way for the protocol evolution, it > becomes messy. No it does not mean that. It means that the features need to be traded off. So the market/user-base will decide what it wants to use that field for. Dino _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
