Anoop, <WG chair hat off> Couple of questions, if I may ask 1. How do you plan to address technical objections raised? 2. Not interested because it is too late and would rather live with any deficiencies in the DP proposals? </WG chair hat off>
-sam On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Unfortunately, no rough consensus emerged from the list discussion. >> >> The chairs and our AD have also been trying to form a design team to take >> forward the encapsulation discussion and see if there is potential to >> design a common encapsulation. However, there has been insufficient >> interest in this initiative. We would like to hear opinions and >> confirmation or disagreement on interest in creating a DP encapsulation >> that addresses the various technical concerns. >> >> > I have little interest in yet another encap. > > Anoop > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
