Agree with Anoop.

Dino

> On Oct 5, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sam,
> 
> My lack of interest in a new encap is because I think it's too late to 
> converge them.  At this point, there are business issues (as opposed to 
> technical ones) that would limit the effectiveness of a new encap.  At best 
> it's a no-op, at worst it creates even more confusion in the market while the 
> other encaps continue with their deployment.
> 
> The best that the IETF can do is at this point is to document these and make 
> sure the encaps are not breaking something else. 
> 
> IMO, none of the objections raised are showstoppers.  Any encap can be 
> modified to do anything we want it to do, with the exception of backwards 
> compatibility.  The need, efficacy, and the price of backwards compatibility 
> can be argued, so that advantage is not a slam dunk either.
> 
> Anoop
> 
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Sam Aldrin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anoop,
> 
> <WG chair hat off>
> Couple of questions, if I may ask
> 1. How do you plan to address technical objections raised? 
> 2. Not interested because it is too late and would rather live with any 
> deficiencies in the DP proposals?
> </WG chair hat off>
> 
> -sam
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Unfortunately, no rough consensus emerged from the list discussion.
> 
> The chairs and our AD have also been trying to form a design team to take 
> forward the encapsulation discussion and see if there is potential to design 
> a common encapsulation. However, there has been insufficient interest in this 
> initiative. We would like to hear opinions and confirmation or disagreement 
> on interest in creating a DP encapsulation that addresses the various 
> technical concerns.
> 
> 
> I have little interest in yet another encap.
> 
> Anoop 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to