Sam,

My lack of interest in a new encap is because I think it's too late to
converge them.  At this point, there are business issues (as opposed to
technical ones) that would limit the effectiveness of a new encap.  At best
it's a no-op, at worst it creates even more confusion in the market while
the other encaps continue with their deployment.

The best that the IETF can do is at this point is to document these and
make sure the encaps are not breaking something else.

IMO, none of the objections raised are showstoppers.  Any encap can be
modified to do anything we want it to do, with the exception of backwards
compatibility.  The need, efficacy, and the price of backwards
compatibility can be argued, so that advantage is not a slam dunk either.

Anoop

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Sam Aldrin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anoop,
>
> <WG chair hat off>
> Couple of questions, if I may ask
> 1. How do you plan to address technical objections raised?
> 2. Not interested because it is too late and would rather live with any
> deficiencies in the DP proposals?
> </WG chair hat off>
>
> -sam
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, no rough consensus emerged from the list discussion.
>>>
>>> The chairs and our AD have also been trying to form a design team to
>>> take forward the encapsulation discussion and see if there is potential to
>>> design a common encapsulation. However, there has been insufficient
>>> interest in this initiative. We would like to hear opinions and
>>> confirmation or disagreement on interest in creating a DP encapsulation
>>> that addresses the various technical concerns.
>>>
>>>
>> I have little interest in yet another encap.
>>
>> Anoop
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nvo3 mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to