On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Sam Aldrin <aldrin.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Anoop Ghanwani <an...@alumni.duke.edu> > wrote: > >> >> If all 3 encaps are willing to address the concern, then we end up with 6 >> encaps. Which will we pick then? >> > RFC7282 > So, which of the 3 encaps are we willing to drop based on the last time the chairs tried to gauge WG consensus? :) Anoop
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
