Plan is as outlined at the start of the thread. -sam
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Anoop Ghanwani <an...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Sam Aldrin <aldrin.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Anoop Ghanwani <an...@alumni.duke.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> If all 3 encaps are willing to address the concern, then we end up with >>> 6 encaps. Which will we pick then? >>> >> RFC7282 >> > > So, which of the 3 encaps are we willing to drop based on the last time > the chairs tried to gauge WG consensus? :) > > Anoop >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
