On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 10/5/2016 6:16 PM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > These could be independent informational docs instead. That's common for >> de-facto industry standards already deployed, as long as they don't >> *interfere* with WG efforts or undermine the stability of the Internet as a >> whole. >> >> That is what was proposed in the original email about the plans the WG > should embark upon. > > > The original email did propose that we continue to evaluate existing > encapsulations, but NOT that they be taken out of the WG and published as > individual informational submissions. > Correct. Call to go independent route lies with authors, not WG, AFAIK.
-sam > > > Joe >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
