On 10/5/2016 12:02 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Sam Aldrin <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >> > I personally do not think WG should just *stamp RFC for drafts because of >> > business reasons. >> > > +1
Agreed, but the WG need not do that. These could be independent informational docs instead. That's common for de-facto industry standards already deployed, as long as they don't *interfere* with WG efforts or undermine the stability of the Internet as a whole. Joe
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
