On 10/6/2016 8:34 AM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Joe Touch <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > The original email did propose that we continue to evaluate > existing encapsulations, but NOT that they be taken out of the WG > and published as individual informational submissions. > > Correct. Call to go independent route lies with authors, not WG, AFAIK. > We can't force them to publish as independent, but we do need to decide that we are not proceeding with the docs as WG items or not.
Joe
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
