On 10/5/2016 6:16 PM, Sam Aldrin wrote: > > These could be independent informational docs instead. That's > common for de-facto industry standards already deployed, as long > as they don't *interfere* with WG efforts or undermine the > stability of the Internet as a whole. > > That is what was proposed in the original email about the plans the WG > should embark upon.
The original email did propose that we continue to evaluate existing encapsulations, but NOT that they be taken out of the WG and published as individual informational submissions. Joe
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
